Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
TP adjustment - application of the Resale Price Method (RPM) as the Most Appropriate Method (‘MAM’) - trading activity - The decision of Supreme Court in Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd.[1965 (4) TMI 91 - SUPREME COURT] is an authority for the proposition that tax authorities and adjudications as well as assessee are not precluded by the positions taken in returns, documents or accounts and have the duty (and a corresponding right) to apply the correct legal principle. Thus, the use of one method in a transfer pricing report does not estop the assessee from later claiming that another method is the most appropriate one, provided that is indeed the correct position. - HC
TP adjustment - application of the Resale Price Method (RPM) as the Most Appropriate Method (‘MAM’) - trading activity - The decision of Supreme Court in Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd.[1965 (4) TMI 91 - SUPREME COURT] is an authority for the proposition that tax authorities and adjudications as well as assessee are not precluded by the positions taken in returns, documents or accounts and have the duty (and a corresponding right) to apply the correct legal principle. Thus, the use of one method in a transfer pricing report does not estop the assessee from later claiming that another method is the most appropriate one, provided that is indeed the correct position. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.