Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
TP adjustment - application of the Resale Price Method (RPM) as the Most Appropriate Method (‘MAM’) - trading activity - The decision of Supreme Court in Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd.[1965 (4) TMI 91 - SUPREME COURT] is an authority for the proposition that tax authorities and adjudications as well as assessee are not precluded by the positions taken in returns, documents or accounts and have the duty (and a corresponding right) to apply the correct legal principle. Thus, the use of one method in a transfer pricing report does not estop the assessee from later claiming that another method is the most appropriate one, provided that is indeed the correct position. - HC
TP adjustment - application of the Resale Price Method (RPM) as the Most Appropriate Method (‘MAM’) - trading activity - The decision of Supreme Court in Kedarnath Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd.[1965 (4) TMI 91 - SUPREME COURT] is an authority for the proposition that tax authorities and adjudications as well as assessee are not precluded by the positions taken in returns, documents or accounts and have the duty (and a corresponding right) to apply the correct legal principle. Thus, the use of one method in a transfer pricing report does not estop the assessee from later claiming that another method is the most appropriate one, provided that is indeed the correct position. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
