Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Levy of penalty - fraudulent passing of CENVAT Credit - Since the appellant’s case falls under Rule 26 (2) (ii) but the same is not existing at the relevant time the appellant cannot be penalized when the goods dealt with by him was not liable for confiscation on the ground that the same was admittedly duty paid. - AT
Levy of penalty - fraudulent passing of CENVAT Credit - Since the appellant’s case falls under Rule 26 (2) (ii) but the same is not existing at the relevant time the appellant cannot be penalized when the goods dealt with by him was not liable for confiscation on the ground that the same was admittedly duty paid. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
