Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Levy of penalty under Section 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - existence of mens rea - plea of bonafide belief had been raised - it was incumbent on the assessing authority to consider the same and pass appropriate order especially with respect to allegation of false declaration. Unless that finding had been returned by the assessing authority, it is difficult to sustain the penalty under Section 10-A of the Act.- HC
Levy of penalty under Section 10-A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - existence of mens rea - plea of bonafide belief had been raised - it was incumbent on the assessing authority to consider the same and pass appropriate order especially with respect to allegation of false declaration. Unless that finding had been returned by the assessing authority, it is difficult to sustain the penalty under Section 10-A of the Act.- HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
