Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - In the present case the assessee has demonstrated that the conditions specified in explanation 3 have not been fulfilled. He has pointed out that during the time period u/s 153 of the Act in the present case notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued to the assessee in response to which return was filed by him. - no penalty in the present case was leviable on the assessee for not having disclosed his income of capital gains earned on a property sold. - AT
Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - In the present case the assessee has demonstrated that the conditions specified in explanation 3 have not been fulfilled. He has pointed out that during the time period u/s 153 of the Act in the present case notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued to the assessee in response to which return was filed by him. - no penalty in the present case was leviable on the assessee for not having disclosed his income of capital gains earned on a property sold. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
