Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - In the present case the assessee has demonstrated that the conditions specified in explanation 3 have not been fulfilled. He has pointed out that during the time period u/s 153 of the Act in the present case notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued to the assessee in response to which return was filed by him. - no penalty in the present case was leviable on the assessee for not having disclosed his income of capital gains earned on a property sold. - AT
Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - In the present case the assessee has demonstrated that the conditions specified in explanation 3 have not been fulfilled. He has pointed out that during the time period u/s 153 of the Act in the present case notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued to the assessee in response to which return was filed by him. - no penalty in the present case was leviable on the assessee for not having disclosed his income of capital gains earned on a property sold. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
