Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director - The petitioners admit that the cheque was drawn by them and handed over to the respondent-complainant. However, they contend that the cheques were issued only as security for the balance amount, which is liable to pay after certification. If that is so, the petitioners ought not to have given those cheques with specific dates and amounts without certification. After presentation of the cheques and institution of the complaint - the petitioners herein are liable to face the trial and prove their innocence - HC
Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director - The petitioners admit that the cheque was drawn by them and handed over to the respondent-complainant. However, they contend that the cheques were issued only as security for the balance amount, which is liable to pay after certification. If that is so, the petitioners ought not to have given those cheques with specific dates and amounts without certification. After presentation of the cheques and institution of the complaint - the petitioners herein are liable to face the trial and prove their innocence - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
