Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Extraordinary writ jurisdiction cannot revive a time-barred statutory GST appeal merely because appellate limitation has expired.
    Natural justice in GST appeals requires a hearing and reasoned order; cryptic rejection was quashed and remanded.
    Consistency in export-service classification supports input tax credit refunds where identical services lack distinguishing features.
    Mandatory hearing before adverse GST determination protects natural justice; unconsidered replies invalidate resulting demand and appellate action.
    Deemed withdrawal of best-judgment assessment follows delayed return filing when the prescribed late fee is paid.
    Commensurate price reduction for input tax credit cannot be replaced by free upgrades, with GST and interest repayable.
    Statutory labelling and institutional-consumer packaging preserved GST exemption for frozen chicken cuts despite corporate names appearing on invoices...
    Scrutiny selection reasons need not be disclosed where a specific information notice is issued during assessment proceedings.
    Development-rights compensation may not accrue to landholders where contractual rights vest commercially in the developer, preventing double taxation.
    Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
    Interim judicial directions on LTC/LFC reimbursements prevented employer TDS default treatment and consequential interest liability.
    Real net winnings govern online gaming taxability, preventing gross wallet credits from being treated as taxable income.
    TDS credit follows taxable income, preventing a former proprietor from claiming deductions attributable to a successor partnership firm.
    Commercial expediency supports interest deductions where interest-free advances fund a wholly owned subsidiary's genuine group business project.
    Marketing expenditure substantiation may justify limited disallowance, but does not alone establish income misreporting for penalty purposes.
    Dealing-error and squared-off derivative losses qualify as allowable business losses when supported by contemporaneous transaction records.
    Prohibited versus restricted imports: provisional release remains available where tyre classification and compliance conditions await adjudication.
    RoDTEP duty credit for authorised restricted sugar exports cannot be denied where prescribed governmental conditions are fulfilled.
    Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
    Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Prosecution proceedings u/s 279(1) - TDS not deposited in the...

      Supreme Court Affirms Prosecution for Non-Compliance with TDS Deposit u/s 279(1); High Court Decision Upheld.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Income TaxJune 18, 2022Case LawsSCH
      Prosecution proceedings u/s 279(1) - TDS not deposited in the government treasury within the prescribed statutory time - once there was a non-deposit, the necessary consequences shall follow including the prosecution. - when the petitioner(s) approached the High Court to set aside the sanction order under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the time the learned Magistrate had already taken the cognizance and issued summons to the petitioner(s). Therefore, the High Court was justified in observing that the Company and the person in charge are required to face the trial. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the High Court. - SC

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax