Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Scope of the "Point of difference" - Divergent views of the members of tribunal - matter referred to third member - appellant sight that more points to be included in the reference made to third member - this `Tribunal’ is of the earnest opinion that the said `impugned order’ cannot be termed by no stretch of imagination as `an Order’, in the teeth of culling out of `the point of difference’ (between the `Hon’ble Two Members of the Tribunal’) and formulating the same, is just a `Ministerial Act’ (`on Administrative Side’) of the `Tribunal’, without an entry upon any `Adjudicatory Process’. - No appeal is maintainable against the same - AT
Scope of the "Point of difference" - Divergent views of the members of tribunal - matter referred to third member - appellant sight that more points to be included in the reference made to third member - this `Tribunal’ is of the earnest opinion that the said `impugned order’ cannot be termed by no stretch of imagination as `an Order’, in the teeth of culling out of `the point of difference’ (between the `Hon’ble Two Members of the Tribunal’) and formulating the same, is just a `Ministerial Act’ (`on Administrative Side’) of the `Tribunal’, without an entry upon any `Adjudicatory Process’. - No appeal is maintainable against the same - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
