Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Scope of the "Point of difference" - Divergent views of the members of tribunal - matter referred to third member - appellant sight that more points to be included in the reference made to third member - this `Tribunal’ is of the earnest opinion that the said `impugned order’ cannot be termed by no stretch of imagination as `an Order’, in the teeth of culling out of `the point of difference’ (between the `Hon’ble Two Members of the Tribunal’) and formulating the same, is just a `Ministerial Act’ (`on Administrative Side’) of the `Tribunal’, without an entry upon any `Adjudicatory Process’. - No appeal is maintainable against the same - AT
Scope of the "Point of difference" - Divergent views of the members of tribunal - matter referred to third member - appellant sight that more points to be included in the reference made to third member - this `Tribunal’ is of the earnest opinion that the said `impugned order’ cannot be termed by no stretch of imagination as `an Order’, in the teeth of culling out of `the point of difference’ (between the `Hon’ble Two Members of the Tribunal’) and formulating the same, is just a `Ministerial Act’ (`on Administrative Side’) of the `Tribunal’, without an entry upon any `Adjudicatory Process’. - No appeal is maintainable against the same - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
