Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Exemption claimed u/s.10(23B) - Mandatory approval from Khadi and Village Industries Commission - approval was granted for more than three assessment years and therefore the condition for claiming exemption u/s. 10(23B) was not fulfilled - It is pertinent to note that the time period for which the certificate has to be granted is not within the control of the assessee. In any case it is only a technical violation for which the assessee could not be penalized by denying the exemption otherwise allowable to the assessee. Thus, we hold that the assessee is entitled for exemption u/s. 10(23B) of the Act. - AT
Exemption claimed u/s.10(23B) - Mandatory approval from Khadi and Village Industries Commission - approval was granted for more than three assessment years and therefore the condition for claiming exemption u/s. 10(23B) was not fulfilled - It is pertinent to note that the time period for which the certificate has to be granted is not within the control of the assessee. In any case it is only a technical violation for which the assessee could not be penalized by denying the exemption otherwise allowable to the assessee. Thus, we hold that the assessee is entitled for exemption u/s. 10(23B) of the Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
