Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Defect in preparation of profit and loss account of the company - amount of bad debt written off - offence either under Section 447 or 448 of the Companies Act - The present prosecution has been filed mainly on the ground that reply notice given by the petitioner was not satisfactory to the defacto complainant. Otherwise, it is not the case of the de facto complainant that there are material facts which have been suppressed and there is no clear cut findings recorded by the de facto complainant as to the nature of the omissions or suppression of material facts - unless and until, there is a finding as to the suppression of the material facts, the prosecution cannot be launched, as a matter of right. - HC
Defect in preparation of profit and loss account of the company - amount of bad debt written off - offence either under Section 447 or 448 of the Companies Act - The present prosecution has been filed mainly on the ground that reply notice given by the petitioner was not satisfactory to the defacto complainant. Otherwise, it is not the case of the de facto complainant that there are material facts which have been suppressed and there is no clear cut findings recorded by the de facto complainant as to the nature of the omissions or suppression of material facts - unless and until, there is a finding as to the suppression of the material facts, the prosecution cannot be launched, as a matter of right. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
