Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Vivad se Vishwas Scheme - Extension of the last date for payment of tax sought to be applied for filing new application - No such press release or notification was issued by the CBDT in the case of the latter. Secondly and fundamentally, the two are different. In the case of the former, the declarations were filed within time i.e., before the last date of 31.03.2021. Thereafter the amount to be paid by the declarants were adjudicated by the designated authority whereafter the payments were to be made; it is for the payment of the determined amount that the time line was extended as above. It cannot be equated with filing of declaration beyond the last date. - HC
Vivad se Vishwas Scheme - Extension of the last date for payment of tax sought to be applied for filing new application - No such press release or notification was issued by the CBDT in the case of the latter. Secondly and fundamentally, the two are different. In the case of the former, the declarations were filed within time i.e., before the last date of 31.03.2021. Thereafter the amount to be paid by the declarants were adjudicated by the designated authority whereafter the payments were to be made; it is for the payment of the determined amount that the time line was extended as above. It cannot be equated with filing of declaration beyond the last date. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.