Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Admissibility of additional evidences under Rule 46A - Power of CIT(A) - Penalty u/s 271D - taking cash loan - Default under provisions of section 269SS - proof of bona fides and genuiness of the transaction - “reasonable cause” - the ld. CIT(A) has to pass a speaking order in writing as to his decision as to admission or refusal to admit additional evidences. - ld. CIT(A) did not comply with Rule 46A of the 1962 Rules. - Matter restored back - AT
Admissibility of additional evidences under Rule 46A - Power of CIT(A) - Penalty u/s 271D - taking cash loan - Default under provisions of section 269SS - proof of bona fides and genuiness of the transaction - “reasonable cause” - the ld. CIT(A) has to pass a speaking order in writing as to his decision as to admission or refusal to admit additional evidences. - ld. CIT(A) did not comply with Rule 46A of the 1962 Rules. - Matter restored back - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.