Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Admissibility of additional evidences under Rule 46A - Power of CIT(A) - Penalty u/s 271D - taking cash loan - Default under provisions of section 269SS - proof of bona fides and genuiness of the transaction - “reasonable cause” - the ld. CIT(A) has to pass a speaking order in writing as to his decision as to admission or refusal to admit additional evidences. - ld. CIT(A) did not comply with Rule 46A of the 1962 Rules. - Matter restored back - AT
Admissibility of additional evidences under Rule 46A - Power of CIT(A) - Penalty u/s 271D - taking cash loan - Default under provisions of section 269SS - proof of bona fides and genuiness of the transaction - “reasonable cause” - the ld. CIT(A) has to pass a speaking order in writing as to his decision as to admission or refusal to admit additional evidences. - ld. CIT(A) did not comply with Rule 46A of the 1962 Rules. - Matter restored back - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.