Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Addition u/s 69C - Unexplained expenses/premium - assessee did not furnish the source of payment of such expenses/premium - The case of assessee throughout the proceedings was that she is not having sufficient income. The expenses incurred by the other co-owners on her behalf and that no such similar addition was made in case of other co-owners, on whose behalf similar expenses were incurred by other co-owners. - It is settled law that the assessee cannot be treated as indifferently in respect of expenses or treatment of capital gain. - Additions deleted - AT
Addition u/s 69C - Unexplained expenses/premium - assessee did not furnish the source of payment of such expenses/premium - The case of assessee throughout the proceedings was that she is not having sufficient income. The expenses incurred by the other co-owners on her behalf and that no such similar addition was made in case of other co-owners, on whose behalf similar expenses were incurred by other co-owners. - It is settled law that the assessee cannot be treated as indifferently in respect of expenses or treatment of capital gain. - Additions deleted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.