Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Recalling of order - Matter was heard ex-parte - it is opined that since the Revenue has already acted upon the impugned final order and has already taken steps to implement the same there seems no justification nor even scope to recall such a final order especially when the proceedings were well in the notice of the applicant since first round of litigation in the impugned matter. - There are no justification in the prayer of the appellant - AT
Recalling of order - Matter was heard ex-parte - it is opined that since the Revenue has already acted upon the impugned final order and has already taken steps to implement the same there seems no justification nor even scope to recall such a final order especially when the proceedings were well in the notice of the applicant since first round of litigation in the impugned matter. - There are no justification in the prayer of the appellant - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
