Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Recalling of order - Matter was heard ex-parte - it is opined that since the Revenue has already acted upon the impugned final order and has already taken steps to implement the same there seems no justification nor even scope to recall such a final order especially when the proceedings were well in the notice of the applicant since first round of litigation in the impugned matter. - There are no justification in the prayer of the appellant - AT
Recalling of order - Matter was heard ex-parte - it is opined that since the Revenue has already acted upon the impugned final order and has already taken steps to implement the same there seems no justification nor even scope to recall such a final order especially when the proceedings were well in the notice of the applicant since first round of litigation in the impugned matter. - There are no justification in the prayer of the appellant - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
