Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Recalling of order - Matter was heard ex-parte - it is opined that since the Revenue has already acted upon the impugned final order and has already taken steps to implement the same there seems no justification nor even scope to recall such a final order especially when the proceedings were well in the notice of the applicant since first round of litigation in the impugned matter. - There are no justification in the prayer of the appellant - AT
Recalling of order - Matter was heard ex-parte - it is opined that since the Revenue has already acted upon the impugned final order and has already taken steps to implement the same there seems no justification nor even scope to recall such a final order especially when the proceedings were well in the notice of the applicant since first round of litigation in the impugned matter. - There are no justification in the prayer of the appellant - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
