Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Oppression and mismanagement - issuance of fresh share capital - the shareholding of the Petitioner was reduced rom 84% to 42%. - It is clear that the R1 Company was established by the 2nd Respondent with the help and investment of the petitioner. It is settled law that when a matter is before NCLT under Section 241-242 irrespective of what parties plead, say, or do, the paramount consideration of the Tribunal is to keep in view what is in the interests of the Company - this Tribunal finds it appropriate to get a valuation of the shares which may enable the Petitioner to leave the company with fair value and fair interest. - Tri
Oppression and mismanagement - issuance of fresh share capital - the shareholding of the Petitioner was reduced rom 84% to 42%. - It is clear that the R1 Company was established by the 2nd Respondent with the help and investment of the petitioner. It is settled law that when a matter is before NCLT under Section 241-242 irrespective of what parties plead, say, or do, the paramount consideration of the Tribunal is to keep in view what is in the interests of the Company - this Tribunal finds it appropriate to get a valuation of the shares which may enable the Petitioner to leave the company with fair value and fair interest. - Tri
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
