Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Excess utilisation of cenvat credit - Whether the appellant is liable to pay interest and penalty on account of alleged excess utilisation of cenvat credit - The demand of interest on alleged excess utilisation of cenvat credit amounts to double demand of interest, as the appellant has already deposited interest on the delayed payment of tax at the applicable rate under Section 75 of the Act. Thus, the second demand of interest is in the nature of double jeopardy, which is not tenable - AT
Excess utilisation of cenvat credit - Whether the appellant is liable to pay interest and penalty on account of alleged excess utilisation of cenvat credit - The demand of interest on alleged excess utilisation of cenvat credit amounts to double demand of interest, as the appellant has already deposited interest on the delayed payment of tax at the applicable rate under Section 75 of the Act. Thus, the second demand of interest is in the nature of double jeopardy, which is not tenable - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
