Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Validity of SCN - Whether the corrigendum/addendum to the show-cause notice is valid in law? - The addendum supplements the allegations in the original show-cause notice and states that out of the original demand of inadmissible credit, remaining amount is also inadmissible on the allegation that the CENVAT credit was fraudulently availed on bogus invoices issued by non-existing/fraudulent suppliers. Therefore, there is no legal infirmity in the issuance of addendum in this regard. - AT
Validity of SCN - Whether the corrigendum/addendum to the show-cause notice is valid in law? - The addendum supplements the allegations in the original show-cause notice and states that out of the original demand of inadmissible credit, remaining amount is also inadmissible on the allegation that the CENVAT credit was fraudulently availed on bogus invoices issued by non-existing/fraudulent suppliers. Therefore, there is no legal infirmity in the issuance of addendum in this regard. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.