Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of SCN - Whether the corrigendum/addendum to the show-cause notice is valid in law? - The addendum supplements the allegations in the original show-cause notice and states that out of the original demand of inadmissible credit, remaining amount is also inadmissible on the allegation that the CENVAT credit was fraudulently availed on bogus invoices issued by non-existing/fraudulent suppliers. Therefore, there is no legal infirmity in the issuance of addendum in this regard. - AT
Validity of SCN - Whether the corrigendum/addendum to the show-cause notice is valid in law? - The addendum supplements the allegations in the original show-cause notice and states that out of the original demand of inadmissible credit, remaining amount is also inadmissible on the allegation that the CENVAT credit was fraudulently availed on bogus invoices issued by non-existing/fraudulent suppliers. Therefore, there is no legal infirmity in the issuance of addendum in this regard. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.