Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - requirement of mandatory pre-deposit - Since this Court had directed the Appellate Authority to exclude the period spent by the petitioner in pursuing the litigation in W.P.(C) No.2963 of 2018, and the said judgment became final, the Appellate Authority was bound to abide by it. Failure to abide by the binding directions in the said judgment has rendered the impuned order perverse. - HC
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - requirement of mandatory pre-deposit - Since this Court had directed the Appellate Authority to exclude the period spent by the petitioner in pursuing the litigation in W.P.(C) No.2963 of 2018, and the said judgment became final, the Appellate Authority was bound to abide by it. Failure to abide by the binding directions in the said judgment has rendered the impuned order perverse. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.