Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Addition u/s 69A - unexplained investment in the bank account - Though there is no specific evidence but the circumstances of the assessee and his lifestyle do suggest that the expression “may” used in Section 69A of the Act, has to be used here. This expression “may” infused discretion in the Assessing Officer to treat such an investment as explained or unexplained investment - Additions deleted - AT
Addition u/s 69A - unexplained investment in the bank account - Though there is no specific evidence but the circumstances of the assessee and his lifestyle do suggest that the expression “may” used in Section 69A of the Act, has to be used here. This expression “may” infused discretion in the Assessing Officer to treat such an investment as explained or unexplained investment - Additions deleted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.