Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Claim of deduction u/s 10A / 10AA on Disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) due to non deduction of TDS - Business Development Commission paid to its US based Associated Enterprises (AE) - there was no requirement on the part of the assessee to deduct TDS on such payments and accordingly, no disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) would be attracted - Since, the disallowance itself do not survive, the grounds raised in cross-appeal stand dismissed as infructuous. The assessee’s appeal stand dismissed as infructuous. - AT
Claim of deduction u/s 10A / 10AA on Disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) due to non deduction of TDS - Business Development Commission paid to its US based Associated Enterprises (AE) - there was no requirement on the part of the assessee to deduct TDS on such payments and accordingly, no disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) would be attracted - Since, the disallowance itself do not survive, the grounds raised in cross-appeal stand dismissed as infructuous. The assessee’s appeal stand dismissed as infructuous. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.