Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Levy of penalty u/s 112 of CA - Smuggling - Gold - The case of Revenue against these appellants have made out on the basis of their statements recorded at the time of investigation or the statement of the co-accused. All such statements were retracted soon thereafter. Further, these statements have also not stood the test of cross-examination during the adjudication proceedings - Levy of penalty against two persons set aside - Against one person, levy of penalty reduced from Rs. 1 lakh. to Rs. 25,000/-. - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 112 of CA - Smuggling - Gold - The case of Revenue against these appellants have made out on the basis of their statements recorded at the time of investigation or the statement of the co-accused. All such statements were retracted soon thereafter. Further, these statements have also not stood the test of cross-examination during the adjudication proceedings - Levy of penalty against two persons set aside - Against one person, levy of penalty reduced from Rs. 1 lakh. to Rs. 25,000/-. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.