Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Seeking release of detained goods and vehicle - generation of second E-way bill - The action of the GST officers in seizing the goods in question is evidently an act of harassment to the petitioners, breach of their fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution of India and blatant abuse of power by the respondents. - the writ petition is, accordingly, allowed with cost of Rs.50,000/- to each of the petitioners, i.e. total Rs.1,00,000/- which the respondents (GST officers) shall pay the petitioners within four weeks from today. - HC
Seeking release of detained goods and vehicle - generation of second E-way bill - The action of the GST officers in seizing the goods in question is evidently an act of harassment to the petitioners, breach of their fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution of India and blatant abuse of power by the respondents. - the writ petition is, accordingly, allowed with cost of Rs.50,000/- to each of the petitioners, i.e. total Rs.1,00,000/- which the respondents (GST officers) shall pay the petitioners within four weeks from today. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.