Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Review of order - Levy of penalty - grounds for review are that the imposition of penalty by the authorities is not automatic and the same can be imposed only when there is a fraud or willful intention to defraud the revenue - The order under review would clearly indicate that intentional and willful non-disclosure of crucial facts can be inferred from the self-declaration made in the web-portal - there are no grounds to interfere with the order impugned in the review - HC
Review of order - Levy of penalty - grounds for review are that the imposition of penalty by the authorities is not automatic and the same can be imposed only when there is a fraud or willful intention to defraud the revenue - The order under review would clearly indicate that intentional and willful non-disclosure of crucial facts can be inferred from the self-declaration made in the web-portal - there are no grounds to interfere with the order impugned in the review - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
