Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Adopting the commission income at 0.5% - Unexplained bank deposits - assessee could not rebut the fact that the assessee himself has stated of having received commission in cash @ 0.5% out of which 0.3% was paid as bank charges. We find that the CIT(Appeal) on the basis of this statement has adopted the commission income but he has allowed the expenses on the actual basis - statement cannot be used in part. It is to be read as a whole. Therefore, considering the statement of the assessee we hereby direct the Assessing Officer to adopt 0.20% as the net commission income of the assessee. - AT
Adopting the commission income at 0.5% - Unexplained bank deposits - assessee could not rebut the fact that the assessee himself has stated of having received commission in cash @ 0.5% out of which 0.3% was paid as bank charges. We find that the CIT(Appeal) on the basis of this statement has adopted the commission income but he has allowed the expenses on the actual basis - statement cannot be used in part. It is to be read as a whole. Therefore, considering the statement of the assessee we hereby direct the Assessing Officer to adopt 0.20% as the net commission income of the assessee. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.