Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - All the allegations if any, would fall under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. No evidence has been adduced to show that the appellant has connived with the exporter in the attempt to export the goods. - The penalty imposed under section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellants herein cannot sustain and requires to be set aside - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - All the allegations if any, would fall under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. No evidence has been adduced to show that the appellant has connived with the exporter in the attempt to export the goods. - The penalty imposed under section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellants herein cannot sustain and requires to be set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
