Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - All the allegations if any, would fall under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. No evidence has been adduced to show that the appellant has connived with the exporter in the attempt to export the goods. - The penalty imposed under section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellants herein cannot sustain and requires to be set aside - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - All the allegations if any, would fall under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. No evidence has been adduced to show that the appellant has connived with the exporter in the attempt to export the goods. - The penalty imposed under section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellants herein cannot sustain and requires to be set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
