Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - All the allegations if any, would fall under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. No evidence has been adduced to show that the appellant has connived with the exporter in the attempt to export the goods. - The penalty imposed under section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellants herein cannot sustain and requires to be set aside - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - All the allegations if any, would fall under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. No evidence has been adduced to show that the appellant has connived with the exporter in the attempt to export the goods. - The penalty imposed under section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellants herein cannot sustain and requires to be set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
