Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Depreciation in respect of certain capitalized amount in the nature of URD purchases [unregistered dealers] forming part of the building - the assessing officer did not make any addition with regard to the URD purchases, which were considered to be bogus or inflation of expenses, in the respective years. In our considered view, without making addition of alleged bogus/inflated expenses, the A.O. could not have disallowed the depreciation alone - AT
Depreciation in respect of certain capitalized amount in the nature of URD purchases [unregistered dealers] forming part of the building - the assessing officer did not make any addition with regard to the URD purchases, which were considered to be bogus or inflation of expenses, in the respective years. In our considered view, without making addition of alleged bogus/inflated expenses, the A.O. could not have disallowed the depreciation alone - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
