Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Unexplained income - whether withdrawals in the name of the partners of the firm represents the unaccounted income of the firm? - The Tribunal first looked into Section 292C of the Act and thereafter, noticed from the materials on record that the note in question was duly signed not only by all the partners of the firm, but also by three witnesses. The names of the partnership firm also figured in it. The Tribunal also took notice of the fact that the withdrawal of the money was from the firm. - No substantial law against the Additions confirmed by the ITAT - HC
Unexplained income - whether withdrawals in the name of the partners of the firm represents the unaccounted income of the firm? - The Tribunal first looked into Section 292C of the Act and thereafter, noticed from the materials on record that the note in question was duly signed not only by all the partners of the firm, but also by three witnesses. The names of the partnership firm also figured in it. The Tribunal also took notice of the fact that the withdrawal of the money was from the firm. - No substantial law against the Additions confirmed by the ITAT - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
