Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reasons to believe - “tangible material” - There is no whisper in the impugned reassessment order as to how the AO has arrived at the aforesaid amount as undisclosed income and that how the aforesaid amount represents undisclosed income of the petitioner/assessee. Thus the reassessment proceeding initiated by the AO against the petitioner for the AY 2017-18 was not only without jurisdiction but also it was abuse of power - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reasons to believe - “tangible material” - There is no whisper in the impugned reassessment order as to how the AO has arrived at the aforesaid amount as undisclosed income and that how the aforesaid amount represents undisclosed income of the petitioner/assessee. Thus the reassessment proceeding initiated by the AO against the petitioner for the AY 2017-18 was not only without jurisdiction but also it was abuse of power - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.