Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Clandestine Removal - Since the sole challenge to the order is its reliance upon third party evidence, it is necessary to check the evidentiary value of the third party evidence - there is no cogent evidence on record to proceed against the appellant so as to penalise them. Hence, it is held that the authority below has wrongly confirmed the demand. Question of imposition of penalty on the present appellants in the given circumstances does not at all arise. - AT
Clandestine Removal - Since the sole challenge to the order is its reliance upon third party evidence, it is necessary to check the evidentiary value of the third party evidence - there is no cogent evidence on record to proceed against the appellant so as to penalise them. Hence, it is held that the authority below has wrongly confirmed the demand. Question of imposition of penalty on the present appellants in the given circumstances does not at all arise. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
