Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Revision u/s 263 - If the CIT was of the view that the AO had not examined this issue at all, it could then led to the conclusion that the order of assessment was erroneous. That is not, however, the case here. - Even if such enquiry may not be mandatory, there has to be some basis on which the CIT can form such a view. In the present case, the basis for forming a view that the profit element in the WIP was not accounted for by the Assessee is absent in the order of the CIT. - HC
Revision u/s 263 - If the CIT was of the view that the AO had not examined this issue at all, it could then led to the conclusion that the order of assessment was erroneous. That is not, however, the case here. - Even if such enquiry may not be mandatory, there has to be some basis on which the CIT can form such a view. In the present case, the basis for forming a view that the profit element in the WIP was not accounted for by the Assessee is absent in the order of the CIT. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
