Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Refund of amount deposited under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - refund sought on the premise that the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the Tax Department under Government Policy made Petitioners legally entitled for the refund of the amount since there are no dues - In short, the department cannot take disadvantage of their own wrong of in action of withdrawing appeal. In that case there was no reason for the Petitioners to apply under the scheme and consequential deposit of amount as per the declaration. - the Taxing Department cannot enrich itself by unauthorized collection of the amount which needs to be refunded - HC
Refund of amount deposited under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - refund sought on the premise that the withdrawal of the appeal filed by the Tax Department under Government Policy made Petitioners legally entitled for the refund of the amount since there are no dues - In short, the department cannot take disadvantage of their own wrong of in action of withdrawing appeal. In that case there was no reason for the Petitioners to apply under the scheme and consequential deposit of amount as per the declaration. - the Taxing Department cannot enrich itself by unauthorized collection of the amount which needs to be refunded - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
