Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act - appellant is a freight forwarder - export of non-basmati rice - prohibited goods or not - admittedly in the course of various statements recorded on different dates from this appellant he has admitted the modus operandi and have stated in detail the modus operandi as well as the amount of remuneration he was getting from the Exporter, which leads to the conclusion that he had connived with the Exporter in the export of prohibited goods for money. - Levy of penalty confirmed at reduced amount - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act - appellant is a freight forwarder - export of non-basmati rice - prohibited goods or not - admittedly in the course of various statements recorded on different dates from this appellant he has admitted the modus operandi and have stated in detail the modus operandi as well as the amount of remuneration he was getting from the Exporter, which leads to the conclusion that he had connived with the Exporter in the export of prohibited goods for money. - Levy of penalty confirmed at reduced amount - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.