Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act - appellant is a freight forwarder - export of non-basmati rice - prohibited goods or not - admittedly in the course of various statements recorded on different dates from this appellant he has admitted the modus operandi and have stated in detail the modus operandi as well as the amount of remuneration he was getting from the Exporter, which leads to the conclusion that he had connived with the Exporter in the export of prohibited goods for money. - Levy of penalty confirmed at reduced amount - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act - appellant is a freight forwarder - export of non-basmati rice - prohibited goods or not - admittedly in the course of various statements recorded on different dates from this appellant he has admitted the modus operandi and have stated in detail the modus operandi as well as the amount of remuneration he was getting from the Exporter, which leads to the conclusion that he had connived with the Exporter in the export of prohibited goods for money. - Levy of penalty confirmed at reduced amount - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.