Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Surrender of Income during Survey u/s 133A - Surrender is voluntary or under influence of revenue (coercion) - The retraction is supported by evidence confronted to the A.O. CIT(A) and relied upon before the ITAT remains unrebutted till date, it clearly brings out a case that the surrender was made based on facts as confronted which resulted in the action of surrender. - the surrender admittedly on facts was made on mistaken belief of facts and law and in the face of the voluminous plethora of evidences countering each of the factors considered relevant by the Revenue for addition, we have found that reliance is only placed upon statement of the Director and the employees. The additions are directed to be deleted. - AT
Surrender of Income during Survey u/s 133A - Surrender is voluntary or under influence of revenue (coercion) - The retraction is supported by evidence confronted to the A.O. CIT(A) and relied upon before the ITAT remains unrebutted till date, it clearly brings out a case that the surrender was made based on facts as confronted which resulted in the action of surrender. - the surrender admittedly on facts was made on mistaken belief of facts and law and in the face of the voluminous plethora of evidences countering each of the factors considered relevant by the Revenue for addition, we have found that reliance is only placed upon statement of the Director and the employees. The additions are directed to be deleted. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.