Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Source of Income of Public Servant or Ostensible Owner - Addl. CIT - Abuse of official position, as public servant - possession of disproportionate assets - This Court is of the view that interest of justice would be served if A-1 is sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years with a fine of ₹ 10,000/- under Section 7 of the Act - this Court is also of the view that the prosecution has been able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that A-3 and A-4 abetted A-1, in the commission of offence punishable under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1) (e) and Section 7 of the Act. - HC
Source of Income of Public Servant or Ostensible Owner - Addl. CIT - Abuse of official position, as public servant - possession of disproportionate assets - This Court is of the view that interest of justice would be served if A-1 is sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years with a fine of ₹ 10,000/- under Section 7 of the Act - this Court is also of the view that the prosecution has been able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that A-3 and A-4 abetted A-1, in the commission of offence punishable under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1) (e) and Section 7 of the Act. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
