Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Waiver of interest and penalty under Sections 36(1) and 72(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - respondent himself has accepted that he has understated his liability to tax on the sale of Nutralite during the year 2007-08 - The Tribunal having modified the rate of tax from 12.5% to 5.5% in terms of the order passed in Rectification Application, it cannot be gainsaid that there is no understatement of output tax liability or overstatement of entitlement to input tax credit by the appellant in the return filed. - Petition dismissed - HC
Waiver of interest and penalty under Sections 36(1) and 72(2) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - respondent himself has accepted that he has understated his liability to tax on the sale of Nutralite during the year 2007-08 - The Tribunal having modified the rate of tax from 12.5% to 5.5% in terms of the order passed in Rectification Application, it cannot be gainsaid that there is no understatement of output tax liability or overstatement of entitlement to input tax credit by the appellant in the return filed. - Petition dismissed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.