Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 17, 2022Case LawsAT
CIRP process - Financial Creditors - In the present case, the Bank has not acted fairly - It was omission or commission of the Bank in not refunding the facility fee to the borrower due to which Bank cannot contend that any default was committed by the borrower on 01.08.2019 - there being no default on principal borrower on 01.08.2019, the Bank also cannot proceed against the Corporate Debtor by filing of Application on the basis of default dated 01.08.2019. - The Adjudicating Authority committed error in admitting the Application under Section 7 on the ground that default was committed by the Appellant on 01.08.2019. - Application quashed - AT
CIRP process - Financial Creditors - In the present case, the Bank has not acted fairly - It was omission or commission of the Bank in not refunding the facility fee to the borrower due to which Bank cannot contend that any default was committed by the borrower on 01.08.2019 - there being no default on principal borrower on 01.08.2019, the Bank also cannot proceed against the Corporate Debtor by filing of Application on the basis of default dated 01.08.2019. - The Adjudicating Authority committed error in admitting the Application under Section 7 on the ground that default was committed by the Appellant on 01.08.2019. - Application quashed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
