Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 17, 2022Case LawsAT
CIRP process - Financial Creditors - In the present case, the Bank has not acted fairly - It was omission or commission of the Bank in not refunding the facility fee to the borrower due to which Bank cannot contend that any default was committed by the borrower on 01.08.2019 - there being no default on principal borrower on 01.08.2019, the Bank also cannot proceed against the Corporate Debtor by filing of Application on the basis of default dated 01.08.2019. - The Adjudicating Authority committed error in admitting the Application under Section 7 on the ground that default was committed by the Appellant on 01.08.2019. - Application quashed - AT
CIRP process - Financial Creditors - In the present case, the Bank has not acted fairly - It was omission or commission of the Bank in not refunding the facility fee to the borrower due to which Bank cannot contend that any default was committed by the borrower on 01.08.2019 - there being no default on principal borrower on 01.08.2019, the Bank also cannot proceed against the Corporate Debtor by filing of Application on the basis of default dated 01.08.2019. - The Adjudicating Authority committed error in admitting the Application under Section 7 on the ground that default was committed by the Appellant on 01.08.2019. - Application quashed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
