Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of application filed under Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 - It is seen that department has collected the bank details of the appellant and found that there was no sufficient fund to honour the cheque on 31.12.2013. On receiving the cheque, the department ought to have presented the cheque and if the same is dishonored could have rejected the declaration as the payment of 50% dues was not made. Without presenting the cheque, merely collecting the bank details on the date of closure of the scheme, it cannot be concluded that appellant has not paid the tax dues in accordance with the provisions of law. - The rejection of declaration filed by appellant under VCES cannot sustain - AT
Rejection of application filed under Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 - It is seen that department has collected the bank details of the appellant and found that there was no sufficient fund to honour the cheque on 31.12.2013. On receiving the cheque, the department ought to have presented the cheque and if the same is dishonored could have rejected the declaration as the payment of 50% dues was not made. Without presenting the cheque, merely collecting the bank details on the date of closure of the scheme, it cannot be concluded that appellant has not paid the tax dues in accordance with the provisions of law. - The rejection of declaration filed by appellant under VCES cannot sustain - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
