Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Classification of goods - Jack Fruit Chips and Banana Chips (salted and masala varieties) made out of raw as well as ripe banana and sold without BRAND NAME - classifiable as NAMKEENS or not - when there is a specific entry providing for the most specific description in the heading 2008 to the impugned products over the residuary heading description of heading 2106.90, the said impugned goods is held appropriately classifiable under heading 2008, by virtue of rule 3(a) of the rules for interpretation. In view of clear provisions in GST laws för interpretation of tariff, the contention of the appellant regarding common parlance understanding of a goods does not hold water, as is therefore rejected. - AAAR
Classification of goods - Jack Fruit Chips and Banana Chips (salted and masala varieties) made out of raw as well as ripe banana and sold without BRAND NAME - classifiable as NAMKEENS or not - when there is a specific entry providing for the most specific description in the heading 2008 to the impugned products over the residuary heading description of heading 2106.90, the said impugned goods is held appropriately classifiable under heading 2008, by virtue of rule 3(a) of the rules for interpretation. In view of clear provisions in GST laws för interpretation of tariff, the contention of the appellant regarding common parlance understanding of a goods does not hold water, as is therefore rejected. - AAAR
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.