Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Disallowance of prior period expenses - Deduction of TDS in the current year - it is settled law that deduction can be permitted in respect of only those expenses which are incurred in the relevant accounting year for the purpose of computing yearly profits and gains. We find that the claim of the assessee on the above two heads of expenses pertaining to earlier period cannot be accepted as it has crystallised in the year and the bills were raised in the earlier assessment year. Being so, the said expenditure cannot be allowed as deduction in this assessment year, which is prior period expenses and first proviso to section 40(a)(ia) has no application in the present case. - AT
Disallowance of prior period expenses - Deduction of TDS in the current year - it is settled law that deduction can be permitted in respect of only those expenses which are incurred in the relevant accounting year for the purpose of computing yearly profits and gains. We find that the claim of the assessee on the above two heads of expenses pertaining to earlier period cannot be accepted as it has crystallised in the year and the bills were raised in the earlier assessment year. Being so, the said expenditure cannot be allowed as deduction in this assessment year, which is prior period expenses and first proviso to section 40(a)(ia) has no application in the present case. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.