Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Availability of alternative remedy - Rejection of request for cancellation/withdrawal of ex-bond Bills of Entry - reducing the basic customs duty and the agricultural infrastructure and development cess on crude palm oil - the opportunity granted to the appellant is held to be thoroughly inadequate. - the appellant need not be relegated to avail the alternative remedy. We are satisfied that the order dated 21.1.2022 impugned in the writ petition is unsustainable in law and in violation of principles of natural justice apart from having passed by misinterpreting the order passed in the earlier writ petition. Therefore, the order dated 21.1.2022 is liable to be set aside. - HC
Availability of alternative remedy - Rejection of request for cancellation/withdrawal of ex-bond Bills of Entry - reducing the basic customs duty and the agricultural infrastructure and development cess on crude palm oil - the opportunity granted to the appellant is held to be thoroughly inadequate. - the appellant need not be relegated to avail the alternative remedy. We are satisfied that the order dated 21.1.2022 impugned in the writ petition is unsustainable in law and in violation of principles of natural justice apart from having passed by misinterpreting the order passed in the earlier writ petition. Therefore, the order dated 21.1.2022 is liable to be set aside. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.